Return to home page


Petition to allow Australian citizens to vote voluntarily on every issue via the internet or phone under direct democracy




S t o p   W o r l d   G o v e r n m e n t



"... them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie..."

Jesus Christ
Revelation 3:9
The New Testament in the Bible
King James Version



Protect western countries from China and India's irresponsible overpopulation of 2.1 billion people...


Last updated: 10th January, 2016


The geographical size of the United States of America is 9.8 million square kilometres.  Its estimated population in 2014 is 318 million people.  Therefore its estimated population density in 2014 is 32.4 people per square kilometre.


United States of America

Geographical size: 9.8 million square kilometres

Estimated population (2014): 318 million people

Estimated population density (2014): 32.4 people per square kilometre

Source:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States



The geographical size of India is only 3.3 million square kilometres, which is just over one third of the size of the United States of America.  If India had the same population density as the United States of America, being 32.4 people per square kilometre, then India would have a population of just 107 million people.

However, as everybody knows, the population of India is much, much greater.  In 2011, India’s population was 1,210 million (1.2 billion) people, which is almost four times as large as the population of the United States of America.

Therefore, using the yardstick of the population density of the United States of America, India is overpopulated by a staggering 1,103 million people (1.1 billion) and 1,030.8%, being 1,210 minus 107 and 1,103 / 107 x 100%, respectively.


India

Geographical size: 3.3 million square kilometres

Estimated population (2011): 1,210 million people (1.2 billion people)

Estimated population density (2011): 368.1 people per square kilometre

Calculated population based on the population density of the United States of America of 32.4 people per square kilometre:
107 million people

Extent of overpopulation in 2011 based on the above calculation:
1,103 million people (ie. 1,210 million minus 107 million) (1.1 billion people)

Extent of overpopulation in 2011 based on the above calculation and expressed as a percentage:
1,030.8% (1,103 / 107 x 100%)

Source:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India



The geographical size of China is 9.6 million square kilometres.  Interestingly, China is only 230,000 square kilometres smaller than the United States of America in size, making it almost the same size.  If China had the same population density as the United States of America, being 32.4 people per square kilometre, then China would have a population of just 311 million people respectively.

However, as everybody knows, the population of China is much, much greater.  In 2011, China’s population was 1,344 million (1.3 billion) people, which is more than four times as large as the population of the United States of America.

Therefore, using the yardstick of the population density of the United States of America, China is overpopulated by a staggering 1,033 million people (1.0 billion) and 332.2%, being 1,344 minus 311 and 1,033 / 311 x 100%, respectively.


China

Geographical size: 9.6 million square kilometres

Estimated population (2011): 1,344 million (1.3 billion)

Estimated population density (2011): 140.0 people per square kilometre

Calculated population based on the population density of the United States of America of 32.4 people per square kilometre:
311 million people

Extent of overpopulation in 2011 based on the above calculation:
1,033 million people (ie. 1,344 million minus 311 million) (1.0 billion people)

Extent of overpopulation in 2011 based on the above calculation and expressed as a percentage:
332.2% (1,033 / 311 x 100%)

Source:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China



Incidentally, the geographical size of the continent of Africa is 30.2 million square kilometres, which is just over three times the size of the United States of America.  If the continent of Africa had the same population density as the United States of America, being 32.4 people per square kilometres, it would have a population of 978 million people.

Interestingly, the population of the continent of Africa in 2013 is 1,100 million (1.1 billion).

Therefore, using the yardstick of the population density of the United States of America, the continent of Africa is overpopulated by only 122 million people and 12.5%, being 1,100 minus 978 and 122/978 x 100%, respectively.


Africa

Geographical size: 30.2 million square kilometres

Actual population (2013): 1,100 million (1.1 billion)

Actual population density (2013): 36.4 people per square kilometre

Calculated population based on the population density of the United States of America:
978 million people

Extent of overpopulation in 2013 based on the above calculation:
122 million people (ie. 1,100 million minus 978 million) (0.1 billion people)

Extent of overpopulation in 2013 based on the above calculation and expressed as a percentage:
12.5% (122 / 978 x 100%)

Source:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa



Based on the population density of the United States of America in 2014, India and China are overpopulated by 1.1 billion people (1,103 million people) and 1.0 billion people (1,033 million people) respectively.  Totalling 2.1 billion people, roughly 29.2% of the world’s population of about 7.2 billion today, it’s not difficult at all to see that an imminent threat to the quality of life for citizens in western nations is this overpopulation in just two countries – India and China.

Over the past ten years, citizens in western countries have constantly been told by the predominantly Jewish-controlled mainstream media that their standard of living is too high and that it’s unsustainable.  We’ve been told that “we’ve won the lottery of life” by being born into these western nations when the standard of living in other countries such as India and China is much lower.  However, it’s now completely obvious that the standard of living we formally enjoyed in western nations up until about the year 2000 was the way that life was meant to be on planet earth for human beings.  The obvious reason why citizens of India and China suffer and simmer in such abject poverty and misery is that they created it themselves by growing their populations explosively and irresponsibly.

The obvious solution to this lamentable situation is to not allow the populations of India and China to continue to spill over into western nations through immigration, but to rather force India and China to lie in the bed that they’ve made by blocking all immigration from these countries so that they’ll have no choice but to figure out their own solutions for this most desperate problem of overpopulation that they’ve created themselves.

My contention is very simple.  Immigration from India and China to western nations such as the United States of America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand should be blocked altogether and the outsourcing of jobs from these western nations to India and China (as well as to other countries) should be properly identified as the treasonous behaviour that it really is.  Allowing citizens of India and China to immigrate to these western countries will do absolutely nothing to solve the problem of overpopulation in India and China, however it quite obviously dramatically impairs the quality of life for citizens of these western nations.  As the populations of these western countries grow due to immigration and as the jobs of the citizens of these countries are outsourced to India and China (as well as to other countries), there are quite obviously more people in these western countries competing for fewer jobs so that the rate of unemployment increases.

Not only are there more people competing for fewer jobs, but there are more people competing for a relatively fixed amount of residential property – housing, so that house prices increase dramatically.  (Certainly, the amount of land in each country is obviously absolutely fixed.)  This causes the price of this fourth most basic need of shelter (after water, food and clothing) to increase so dramatically that it becomes out of reach of the average citizen, who has no sociopathic aspirations to climb the ranks of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan, also known as the satanic Illuminati, and earn an exorbitant income, but who just wants to live a peaceful life based on love, like most people do, made in the image of God as they are.  By increasing the price of residential property, immigration renders the life of these average citizens untenable, leading to the widespread social evils of frustration, depression and despair.  This is the ill-wind that originates from the synagogue of Satan.

It’s therefore becoming increasingly obvious that governments of western countries, controlled as they are by the synagogue of Satan, are deliberately betraying their own citizens and destroying their own countries through the outsourcing of jobs overseas and through mass immigration, with the objective of so damaging these countries economically, financially and socially, that their citizens have no choice in their weakened state but to surrender to the agenda that the synagogue of Satan wants to impose on them.  This agenda includes privatisation of all essential services, such as water, electricity generation, telecommunications and education, together with increasing centralisation of governmental and legislative control, such as we’ve witnessed in the European Union over the past five years since its establishment in its current form in 2009.

The synagogue of Satan literally wants a return to the feudalism of earlier centuries, whereby all assets are owned by the wealthy and maintained for their benefit by an underclass of impoverished, easily-controllable citizens in their multitudes.  However, there are many more of ‘us’ than there are of ‘them’.  Together, in our millions, we are absolutely capable of opposing the agenda of the synagogue of Satan and effecting the kind of change that will actually benefit humanity instead.

It is absolutely essential that western nations protect themselves from the overpopulation of India and China.  Western nations didn’t create these problems, therefore their governments must not allow their own citizens to bear the consequences of them.

Businesses operating in western countries such as the United States of America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, which formerly employed citizens of those respective western countries to drive their operations, have taken advantage of the oversupply of labour provided by the overpopulation in India and China.  Not being satisfied with their existing profits, they’ve greedily sought to increase their profits further by outsourcing jobs to India and China (as well as to other countries).  For an Australian company, for example, led by Australian directors who reside in Australia, to outsource Australian jobs overseas to China so that they can make their products more cheaply, which they sell to Australian citizens, and increase their profits, is treasonous behaviour.  The obvious loser arising from this outsourcing is Australian citizens whose jobs have been sent overseas to India and China.

We’ve constantly been told over the past ten years that citizens of western nations are consuming too many of the world’s resources while people in countries like India and China suffer in poverty.  What has been deliberately omitted from this narrative by the predominantly Jewish-controlled mainstream media and predominantly Jewish-controlled think tanks pushing it, is that the oversupply of people in India and China, totalling 2.1 billion people, is the real reason for the desperate poverty and struggle in these two countries.  India and China are mired in poverty as a direct result of their own highly irresponsible, foolish, explosive population growth over the past century.

I haven’t yet discovered what the causes of this completely irresponsible overpopulation in India and China are.  In India, I suspect that the causes are a belief that having children brings prosperity, because the children will work on behalf of the parents, and also a desire for the social status that large families bring.  However this is only speculation on my part.  In China, I suspect that the cause is a citizenry that was brainwashed last century by the rulers to believe that it was in their best interests to multiply (eg. Chairman Mao last century who advocated vigorous population growth) when, in fact, the rulers wanted population growth in order to lower the living standards per person so that it was easier to control and rule over the people.

Could population growth in western nations, arising from immigration into western nations, be the same means by which governments in western countries are seeking to control their own populations - by diminishing their standard of living and therefore weakening and disempowering individual citizens?  I believe that this is exactly what’s happening.  Nobody in the western nations of the United States of America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand can deny that since about the year 2000, the average quality of life of each citizen in these western nations has declined dramatically.

What the citizens of India and China have failed to grasp is the simple mathematics which dictate that the more people there are, the lower their quality of life is, because the resources in those countries, such as land, water and food are relatively fixed.  Therefore, as the number of people in those countries increases through population growth, the share of each individual person in these resources of those countries decreases, leading to a lower quality of life.

Mass immigration into western countries serves to escalate tension, animosity and conflict between the existing population and the newly arrived immigrants.  This is intended by the governments of these countries, because these governments are under the control of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan.  These governments actively promote this mass immigration.

(The governments of the western countries of the United States of America, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Australia and New Zealand are all under the control of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan.)

These governments deliberately send jobs overseas while simultaneously promoting immigration into their countries, with the express intention of fomenting tension, hostility and conflict between the existing citizens of these countries and the newly arrived immigrants, whose arrival is correctly perceived by the existing citizens to cause a decline in their quality of life.  Since there are fewer jobs available, due to outsourcing of jobs overseas that government policy has enabled, and more people competing for them due to the arrival of immigrants, the share of each citizen in the resources of the country decreases.  This share in the resources of the country is a reliable proxy for quality of life, which also decreases.

The key to understanding this problem is to realise that it is not the immigrants themselves who are the problem.  A significant portion of them come from countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, from which they have been forced to flee as a result of the unjustified wars that the synagogue of Satan has deliberately initiated in those countries, such as the unjustified invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and the unjustified invasion of Iraq in 2003, both of which resulted in the shameful, murderous genocide of multiple hundreds of thousands of Muslims.  Many of these immigrants are understandably severely traumatised.

Immigrants from other countries such as China and India are not the problem either.  People of Asian origin, such as from China and India, routinely show themselves to be wonderful examples of human beings, made in the image of God as they are.  As an Anglo-Saxon male with a Scottish surname, I would personally argue that immigrants from Asian countries display better characteristics, on average, than the existing citizens of Anglo-Saxon descent who have been subjected to the degrading culture of television, Hollywood movies and pornography (both paper-based pornography and internet pornography) that has been imposed upon them by the synagogue of Satan for the last three decades at least.

The problem is the governments controlled by the synagogue of Satan (SOS) who are actively encouraging and orchestrating this mass immigration.

There is absolutely nothing to be gained from existing citizens displaying animosity towards immigrants from other countries, who routinely show themselves to be delightful human beings, just like human beings all over the world routinely show themselves to be delightful.  This kind of animosity between existing citizens and immigrants is exactly what the SOS wants to foment, so that while the existing citizens are distracted by the animosity they feel towards newly-arrived citizens, the governments controlled by the SOS can proceed unchallenged with their agenda of further eroding the sovereignty of the countries over which they rule, so that these countries can be absorbed into the various unions that the SOS is seeking to form.  The ultimate objective of the SOS is to rule over the entire planet via world government ruling over these unions.

There is everything to be gained by maintaining amiable relations with newly arrived citizens, who routinely prove to be delightful, just like all human beings around the world routinely prove to be delightful, and by simultaneously strenuously demanding that the government both cease encouraging the transfer of jobs overseas and stop immigration altogether, so that the population of the country will stop increasing and so that the standard of living of all citizens will stop declining.

This is what needs to be done to protect Australian citizens, for example, in the western nation of Australia, for example, from India and China’s explosive, irresponsible population growth:








Return to home page


Petition to allow Australian citizens to vote voluntarily on every issue via the internet or phone under direct democracy